Promote.fun vs ViewsBase: Review, Costs and Control
Compare Promote.fun vs ViewsBase for brand clipping campaigns: published costs, creator responsibilities, view checks and payment questions.
By Jacob Georgas · November 3, 2026
Choose Promote.fun when your brand needs an open performance marketplace where creators find campaigns, post content and earn per view from your funded budget. Choose ViewsBase when you bring your own creators and need post tracking, earnings calculations and a ledger of payments your team sends.
This comparison is for consumer-app founders, DTC marketers and agencies. Clippers looking for paid work can browse Promote.fun's campaigns.
Methodology — checked 3 November 2026: ViewsBase publishes this comparison. We read Promote.fun's public homepage, campaign list, individual campaign pages, community and leaderboard pages, and its Terms of Service (last updated 21 October 2026) on 3 November 2026, alongside ViewsBase's pricing and documentation. These are vendor claims and documented workflows; we did not buy a Promote.fun campaign or test its payouts.
What is Promote.fun and how does a brand campaign run?
Promote.fun's terms describe a performance-based creator marketplace. Its homepage says brands set a budget and CPM (the rate per 1,000 views). The public launch link opens a 15-minute discovery call, and brands deposit campaign funds before launch. Creators join listed campaigns, publish content that follows the brief and earn on verified views.
Public campaign pages show briefs, submission decisions and payment figures. The Movie Trailer, Private TV Commercial and The Weekend – Reactions listings we saw were published under promote.fun. That suggests Promote's team may publish listings for brands. Ask who writes the final brief, who supplies footage and who approves it; the terms require the brand to provide accurate campaign details but do not say who prepares the brief or assets.
Is Promote.fun legit?
Promote.fun has public campaigns, published terms and a footer naming Promote Media, Inc.. Its navigation carries an ALPHA label.
On 3 November 2026, the third-party Trustpilot profile showed 24 reviews and a 4.5/5 TrustScore, with the profile claimed since February 2026. The visible reviews were mostly creator experiences. Trustpilot cautioned that the company had not recently invited reviews, so they might not be representative.
An indexed LinkedIn self-description identifies Jasper Bloomfield as Promote.fun's founder; we could read the snippet, not the full profile. These are observable business signals, not independent verification of transfers or campaign returns.
What does Promote.fun cost compared with ViewsBase?
Pricing and features checked 3 November 2026. Prices are USD. Campaign figures are a public snapshot, not a standard rate card or minimum commitment.
| Buying question | Promote.fun | ViewsBase |
|---|---|---|
| What public prices can we see? | The homepage's active campaigns showed budgets of $1,600–$13,010 and rates of $0.60–$3.00 per 1,000 views. | Monthly plans: Starter $49 / 1,000 posts; Growth $149 / 3,000; Scale $299 / 7,500; Agency $349 / 7,500 shared across clients. Enterprise custom. |
| What fees apply? | Numerical brand fees, take rate and minimum budget were not published in reviewed pages. The terms refer to platform fees, and say network, exchange or processing fees may apply to payouts. | No cut of creator pay. Creator compensation and external payment costs are separate. |
| Which platforms? | Its platform description names TikTok, Instagram, YouTube and X; confirm your campaign's mix. | TikTok, Instagram and YouTube Shorts. Instagram views depend on public availability. |
| What reporting is visible? | Campaign pages show submission decisions, budget, paid and remaining amounts, total and payable views, and a leaderboard tab. Export terms were not published in reviewed material. | Payout ledger on every plan; payout CSV files on Scale and above; branded reports on Agency. |
| Can we try it? | Public launch route is a discovery call; no trial established in reviewed pages. | 14-day free trial, card required; cancel before it ends to avoid a charge. |
ViewsBase's allowance counts newly tracked, non-rejected posts in the billing month. Rejected posts are free; old posts do not consume the next month's allowance. Campaigns, creators and team seats are unlimited.
Campaign-page arithmetic check, 3 November 2026: Movie Trailer displayed $4,000 paid at $1.75 per 1,000 views. Calculating $4,000 ÷ $1.75 × 1,000 gives about 2.29 million views, matching the rounded 2.3M payable shown. The page also showed 2.5M total views, so $4,000 works out to about $1.60 per 1,000 total views ($4,000 ÷ 2.5M × 1,000) against the $1.75 rate on payable views. Read the paid amount, rate and payable-view field together. Then ask which number your deposit is charged against, and whether the displayed CPM represents gross creator earnings, net receipts or brand billable spend. Request a quote separating creator budget, platform fees and payment costs. A card alone cannot establish the complete brand cost, or a savings claim for either route.
Where does the campaign money sit?
Promote.fun's funding terms describe a custodial or escrow-style balance and non-refundable deposits. Ask how unused funds are handled when a campaign pauses or closes.
ViewsBase holds no money and never pays creators. Your team sends payments through its own method and records them. Budget separately for recruiting, production, review and payment administration.
Where is Promote.fun the better fit?
When finding distribution is the missing job. A brand with approved footage but no clipper relationships can offer paid work to a marketplace community. On 3 November, its community page showed 135,157 users, 177.5K pages and 3.1B followers: the site's own counters, not audited reach. Ask how many of those pages fit your niche and viewer countries. ViewsBase supplies no creators.
If you already have finished footage, its Private TV Commercial listing shows a distribution-only brief: participants post the provided video as is, may add text, and should run brand-safe pages in the listed niches.
When you want moderation and payout processing together. Both appear in its service terms, potentially reducing a lean team's workload. If X matters to you, note that Promote.fun's terms name it and ViewsBase tracks only TikTok, Instagram and YouTube Shorts. The terms guarantee no particular reach, engagement or sales result.
For another marketplace, see Whop Content Rewards vs ViewsBase. If you want a partner to produce clips too, compare Clouted's managed service; our UGC and clipping platform guide separates the broader options.
Who finds clippers, checks the work and pays?
Assign the work before committing. Promote.fun's column follows its marketplace terms and public campaigns.
| Responsibility | A Promote.fun campaign | Your roster with ViewsBase |
|---|---|---|
| Find participants | Creators discover marketplace campaigns; confirm admission for your brief. | Your team recruits and shares invitations or applications. |
| Supply instructions and assets | Brand provides accurate campaign details; agree preparation duties before launch. | Your team writes the brief and clears assets. |
| Make and publish posts | Creators follow campaign requirements; some briefs request posting provided footage. | Your creators or separately hired editors produce and post. |
| Review creative | Promote.fun runs moderation. Its terms let the brand require removal, editing or correction within 24 hours; earnings verified before the request stay payable. Confirm pre-publication approval rights. | Your operator checks brand fit and handles feedback. |
| Decide disputed views | Promote.fun's systems set eligible views; creators can appeal and Promote.fun decides. Ask whether and how your brand can query counts charged to your budget. | Your operator reviews the software's evidence and resolves exceptions. |
| Release or record payment | Promote.fun releases funds after verified performance. | Your team transfers money; ViewsBase records it. |
| Establish content rights | Published creator-to-brand license, plus applicable campaign terms. | Your creator agreements; tracking grants no license. |
Promote.fun describes itself as an intermediary outside the creator–brand contract. Identify your contracting parties and approval owner.
For your own roster, join links and applications organize onboarding; creators see their own rates, posts and earnings. Our clipping campaign guide covers operational setup.
Which views count before someone gets paid?
Promote.fun's verification rules describe automated and manual checks for artificial engagement, inorganic traffic, restricted regions and low-trust signals. Its terms permit changes to CPMs, thresholds and eligibility during a campaign. Obtain the counting start, cutoff, minimums, caps and change-notification process for your offer.
ViewsBase prices each post from its creator's deal: rate per 1,000 views, tiers, caps, fixed post amounts or per-post amounts with bonuses. Offer changes apply to future posts; existing posts retain their terms.
Its counting rules default to seven days from publication and rejection below 1,000 views at closing; both are configurable. A successful closing fetch freezes the count and amount. A failed fetch leaves the post open.
With spike holds enabled, suspicious view jumps keep unpaid posts outside ready-to-pay totals and payout files until reviewed. The setting is on for new campaigns. A flag calls for inspection; it does not prove fraud.
How does Promote.fun pay clippers?
Its payment terms allow fiat or cryptocurrency payouts, possible network, processing or exchange costs, and delays during fraud or compliance review.
For either model, distinguish views still counting, approved earnings and money received. Request a sample report showing those stages, and measure installs, signups or purchases separately from views.
What do real pay-per-view campaigns look like?
Our own-app study, pulled on 17 October 2026, covers 12,120 pay-per-view posts for DePuff AI from 2 July 2025 to 2 October 2026. These were mostly TikTok slideshows and talking-head posts: one advertiser, not a market census or Promote.fun campaigns.
The median post had 5,111 views, 39.9% were rejected, and the top 10% of earning posts accounted for 68.4% of earnings. Earnings include positive amounts on paid or finalized posts, some awaiting transfer.
That rejection share makes a practical question worth asking: how are rejected submissions counted against your deposit? Also establish who reviews large earners and resolves exceptions before budget is committed. With your own roster, name that person internally. Neither the median post result nor a few successful examples are enough to forecast total spend.
Do we own the clips, and can we use both platforms?
Promote.fun's content terms grant brands a worldwide, perpetual, royalty-free commercial license, including reposting, editing, remixing and advertising. Settle raw-file delivery, posting-account ownership and creator-account ad authorization separately. Additional campaign-specific terms control where they conflict.
A hybrid can suit a launch: marketplace distribution alongside an independently recruited roster tracked in ViewsBase. Promote.fun prohibits off-platform deals that bypass it or circumvent fees, so do not treat it as a recruiting list to move elsewhere.
Assign each post a clear paying arrangement. There is no integration between the two; keep records for each separately.
What should we ask Promote.fun before funding?
Bring sample footage and request campaign-specific answers:
- Complete price: What is the minimum commitment, which fees sit inside the deposit, and which charges or creator deductions are additional?
- Audience and participation: Which niches and viewer countries can we reach, what evidence can we inspect, and can we bring existing creators?
- Approval: The terms require removal or correction within 24 hours of a brand request; previously verified earnings stay payable. Can we approve before publication, and who coordinates changes?
- Counting and payment: Which views earn, when does counting stop, how are rule changes communicated, and when can creators withdraw? What withdrawal minimum applies? Can we dispute counted views charged to our deposit?
- Records and closure: What per-post export do we receive, how long is reporting accessible, and what happens to unused funding and outstanding earnings?
FAQ
How much does Promote.fun charge?
Promote.fun publishes no brand fee, take rate or minimum budget. On 3 November 2026, active campaigns on its homepage showed budgets of $1,600–$13,010 at $0.60–$3.00 per 1,000 views. Treat that as a snapshot and request a complete quote through the discovery call.
Does Promote.fun pay per 1,000 views?
Yes. Creators earn on verified views at the campaign's CPM.
Can we use Promote.fun and ViewsBase together?
Yes, with contractual permission and an independently recruited roster. Keep payment responsibilities separate and respect Promote.fun's rules against bypassing it.
Who should pick which?
Pick Promote.fun if you need campaign participants, marketplace verification and payout processing together. Confirm audience fit, approval rights and complete cost.
Pick ViewsBase if you recruit creators and own briefs, reviews and external payments. Test actual offers and post links, then reconcile the ledger against your payment records.
Use both when marketplace distribution and your independent roster serve distinct jobs, with contractual permission and clear responsibility for each creator obligation.